Hi Alia, As suggested, I have added a new section on how to compute node-protecting R-LFA paths for destinations with multiple ECMP primary nexthops, and uploaded the 09 version.
Request you to review the same and let us know your feedback and comments. Thanks and Regards, -Pushpasis On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 9:42 AM, Alia Atlas <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Pushpasis, > > Sure - a separate section is fine. A detailed example would be useful for > those who don't have years of > thinking through the different cases yet. > > Thanks, > Alia > > On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 11:06 PM, Pushpasis Sarkar < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi Alia, >> >> Many many thanks for the comments. >> >> Regarding your comment on an example with multiple ecmp primary next-hop >> nodes, is it okay if we include it as a separate section? I do have an >> example in mind, but am not sure including it directly in the problem >> statement will complicate it for the readers to understand it, or not. >> >> I will wait for your suggestion on the above. :) >> >> Thanks and regards, >> -Pushpasis >> >> On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 10:01 PM, Alia Atlas <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> As is customary, I have done my AD review of >>> draft-ietf-rtgwg-rlfa-node-protection-08. First, I would like to thank >>> the authors - Pushpasis, Shraddha, Chris, Hannes, and Stephane - for their >>> work on this well-written document. >>> >>> I do not have any substantial comments from my review, so I am happy to >>> request an IETF Last Call on this and have scheduled it for the Jan 19 IESG >>> telechat. >>> >>> My one comment is that it would be useful to have a slightly larger >>> clear example where the primary path has multiple ECMP next-hop nodes. >>> This can be a point of complexity and is not really described clearly as >>> such. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Alia >>> >> >> >
_______________________________________________ rtgwg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
