Acee:
Thank you. Just to clarify your answer, does mean you had a discussion with the operators (e.g. openconfig) who implement the basic BGP model as well? Sue From: Acee Lindem (acee) [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, March 29, 2017 11:47 AM To: Susan Hares; [email protected] Subject: Re: Question on draft-ietf-rtgwg-routing-types Hi Sue, We incorporated the types that were required for L3VPN/L2VPN models. Specifically, route-distinguisher, route-target, route-target-type, and the vpn-route-target. There was an extensive discussion with the authors of these models. Thanks, Acee From: rtgwg <[email protected]> on behalf of Susan Hares <[email protected]> Date: Wednesday, March 29, 2017 at 10:35 AM To: Routing WG <[email protected]> Subject: Question on draft-ietf-rtgwg-routing-types RTGWG DT: Just curious, did the DT consider BGP routing types? If so, where did you decide BGP routing types were not common routing types? Sue
_______________________________________________ rtgwg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
