On 4/24/17, 5:28 PM, "Acee Lindem (acee)" <[email protected]> wrote:

>Hi Warren, 
>
>See inline. 
>
>
>On 4/24/17, 5:02 PM, "Warren Kumari" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>Warren Kumari has entered the following ballot position for
>>draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-key-chain-20: No Objection
>>
>>When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
>>email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
>>introductory paragraph, however.)
>>
>>
>>Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
>>for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>>
>>
>>The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
>>https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-key-chain/
>>
>>
>>
>>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>COMMENT:
>>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>
>>I had a few minor comments, mainly on the explanatory text -- I'm not a
>>YANG expert (that's Benoit's job :-)):
>>
>>1: "A key chain can be used by any service or application requiring
>>authentication or encryption." - from my reading, this only symmetric
>>keys; should this be "A key chain can be used by any service or
>>application requiring authentication or encryption using symmetric keys"?
>
>Yes - I believe I added “symmetric” in one other place and would be fine
>with adding it here as well.
>>
>>
>>2: "They are also used to support of security requirements (e.g., TCP-AO
>>Algorithms [TCP-AO-ALGORITHMS]) not implemented by vendors or only a
>>single vendor." -- if it is not implemented, why put a key string on a
>>device? Perhaps this was intended to be "not **yet** implemented..." ?
>
>Vendors supporting TCP based protocols, most notably TCP, currently
>support other less-secure algorithms. It is the goal to support TCP-AO in
>the model so that a revision is not required to roll out TCP-AO.

I mean, “most notably BGP”…
>
>Thanks,
>Acee 
>>
>>
>

_______________________________________________
rtgwg mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg

Reply via email to