I just got a bounce for this message for the chairs alias. The same thing just happened on v6ops and the explanation is that when outlook (not something I want to use but have no choice about) resends a message, it can use one of 50 or more different addresses and grey listing cannot cope with that and the message bounces.
This is a property of using [email protected] It is different when you use @ietf.org. I have Henrik's and Glen's replies on 13apr2017 but they are not on the v6ops list. Fred Baker was conducting a poll and set the reply address to the chairs alias so as not to clutter the list; he lost most of the replies. My (pessimistic) conclusion is that most mail to [email protected] will not get through, but then I am pessimistic:-( Tom Petch ----- Original Message ----- From: "t.petch" <[email protected]> To: "Jeff Tantsura" <[email protected]>; "RTGWG" <[email protected]> Cc: "rtgwg-chairs" <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, April 21, 2017 4:55 PM > "JT: Xufeng presented 4 considerations yesterday on how to proceed, > please take a look." > > Do you have a reference for that, preferrably an I-D and not PowerPoint? > > Tom Petch > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Jeff Tantsura" <[email protected]> > To: "RTGWG" <[email protected]> > Cc: "rtgwg-chairs" <[email protected]> > Sent: Friday, April 14, 2017 12:08 AM > > > > The minutes have been published at: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/minutes-98-rtgwg/ > > Please provide your comments. > > > > Thanks! > > Jeff & Chris _______________________________________________ rtgwg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
