Hi Henning,

Thank you much for the review.

You are right about the mapping for "address of the virtual router". The 
existing YANG data model for configuring and managing IP addresses is RFC7277, 
which augments the ietf-interfaces model specified by RFC7223. This VRRP model 
follows the same paradigm. Such a structure is also VRRP protocols are usually 
implemented.

We will fix the error in  Appendix A. in the next revision.

Regards,
- Xufeng

From: Henning Rogge [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Monday, April 24, 2017 3:41 AM
To: Jonathan Hardwick <[email protected]>; Xufeng Liu 
<[email protected]>; Athanasios Kyparlis <[email protected]>; 
[email protected]; [email protected]
Cc: Routing WG <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Routing directorate QA review of draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-vrrp

Hi,

Jonathan Hardwick asked me to do an early review of the 
draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-vrrp document (currently revision 02) for the routing 
directorate.

The draft itself is pretty straight forward and compact, especially when you 
consider that a lot of text has to be repeated two or four times (IPv4/IPv6, 
config vs. read-only state).

But I had quite a bit of trouble mapping the phrases from the new 
draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-vrrp-02 document to the existing VRRP documents (e.g. 
RFC5798). This might come from my unfamilarity with VRRP.

The draft YANG model allows to read (if:interfaces-state) and configure 
(if:interfaces) virtual IP addresses, but this does not seem to be a common 
phrase from the RFCs. Is it the same as "address of the virtual router" often 
mentioned in RFC5798?

In addition to this, I found (I think) a typo or inconsistency in Appendix A:
the ascii art says "eth0" but tree says "eth1".

Henning Rogge

On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 5:43 PM, Jonathan Hardwick 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> 
wrote:
Hi Henning

Please would you do a routing directorate early review of this draft?  Would 
you be able to do it in 2 to 3 weeks?

Many thanks
Jon


Please would you do a routing directorate QA review of this draft?
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-vrrp/

The draft is still in the RTGWG and is ready for WG last call.  The WG chairs 
have asked for a QA review from the directorate.  The following link provides 
guidance on QA reviews.
https://trac.ietf.org/trac/rtg/wiki/RtgDirDocQa



_______________________________________________
rtgwg mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg

Reply via email to