Benoit Claise has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-key-chain-20: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-key-chain/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Editorial: - To be aligned with the other feature descriptions: OLD: feature accept-tolerance { description "To specify the tolerance or acceptance limit."; } NEW: feature accept-tolerance { description "Support the tolerance or acceptance limit."; } - I would spell out "Network Management Datastore Architecture" [NMDA] All lights are green from a tooling point of view. As a side note, since you used the new NMDA tree structure, I would warn all the draft authors with YANG modules that depend on this YANG module that they might have to update their modules. See https://www.yangcatalog.org/yang-search/impact_analysis.php?modules[]=ietf-key-chain&recurse=0&rfcs=0 for the source of information. _______________________________________________ rtgwg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
