Hello Chris, I am not aware of IPR related to this document.
Regards, Pierre. > On Jun 21, 2017, at 5:05 PM, Chris Bowers <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > _____________________________________________ > From: Chris Bowers > Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2017 12:26 PM > To: 'RTGWG' <[email protected]> > Cc: '[email protected]' > <[email protected]> > Subject: RE: WG last call for draft-ietf-rtgwg-uloop-delay > > > RTGWG, > > The consensus appears to be for the WG to request publication of this draft > as a standards track document. > > We still need IPR responses from two of the authors before we can proceed. > > Thanks, > Chris and Jeff > > _____________________________________________ > From: Chris Bowers > Sent: Friday, June 2, 2017 3:43 PM > To: RTGWG <[email protected]> > Subject: WG last call for draft-ietf-rtgwg-uloop-delay > > > RTGWG, > > This email starts the two week WG last call for draft-ietf-rtgwg-uloop-delay. > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rtgwg-uloop-delay/ > > Please indicate support for or opposition to the publication of this > standards track document, along with the reasoning for that support or > opposition. > > IPR: > If you are listed as a document author or contributor, please respond to > this email stating whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR. The > response needs to be sent to the RTGWG mailing list. The document will > not advance to the next stage until a response has been received from > each author and each individual that has contributed to the document. > > The document currently has the following IPR disclosure associated > with it. > https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/2565/ > > This last call will end on Friday June 16th. > > Thanks, > Chris and Jeff >
_______________________________________________ rtgwg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
