Xufeng, I see that draft-ietf-mpls-static-yang-04 was issued. My comment is against that version now.
On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 03:44:28PM +0000, Xufeng Liu wrote: > > I'm not conversant with common Yang tool suites, but it seems if the > > ordered-by > > user rather than the default of system, then the tooling might present the > > bottom of stack entry as the first or last node of the list rather than > > requiring the > > consumer to have to run a sort of the nodes based on the id number and then > > select the first node. > > [Xufeng] Are you suggesting to use the position to order instead of the ID > value? If so, what would be the semantics of the ID value? If we cannot > get rid of the ID key, I don't know if using a separate ordering mechanism > will make the usability better. I see that you changed things to use a constrained index range with id 0 being special for top of stack. So, if you have labels with indexes 0, 5, 10, 15, then 15 would be the bottom of stack? -- Jeff _______________________________________________ rtgwg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
