NP, we should also change the draft name, but suggest that is done when the 
adoption poll completes.

Stewart

Sent from my iPad

> On 4 Aug 2017, at 22:44, Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> I appreciate that the authors have modified the draft in response to some 
> comments I made - and I believe the changes satisfy my concerns.
> 
> I support WG adoption with one significant caveat - the title of the document 
> needs to be modified to accurately reflect the scope of the revised draft. 
> This is now confined to defining how to advertise "routing timer parameters" 
> - it is no longer a generalized "any flavor of routing parameter" - which is 
> one of the points I made in my objections.
> 
> Please modify the name to accurately reflect the redefined scope.
> 
>   Les
> 
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: rtgwg [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jeff Tantsura
>> Sent: Friday, August 04, 2017 12:46 PM
>> To: RTGWG
>> Cc: [email protected]; 'rtgwg-chairs'
>> Subject: Request for WG adoption of for draft-bryant-rtgwg-param-sync
>> 
>> Dear RTGWG,
>> 
>> The authors have requested the RTGWG to adopt for draft-bryant-rtgwg-
>> param-sync as the working group document.
>> 
>> WG expressed support during the last RTGWG meeting and the authors have
>> addressed all the comments received.
>> Please indicate support or no-support by August 18, 2017.
>> 
>> If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond to this
>> email stating of whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR. The
>> response needs to be sent to the RTGWG mailing list. The document will not
>> advance to the next stage until a response has been received from each
>> author and each individual that has contributed to the document.
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> Jeff
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> rtgwg mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg

_______________________________________________
rtgwg mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg

Reply via email to