On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 02:42:59PM +0200, Matthieu Boutier wrote: [snip] > Perhaps having something like the following(?): > > 3. Forwarding tables representations > 3.1. Source Address Dependant Forwarding tables > -> this is just a dump of the announces > 3.2. Source-Prefix-Scoped Forwarding Tables > -> using "Generating Source-Prefix-Scoped Forwarding Tables v2" > 3.3. Examples
It's already there: if you look at -04 of the draft, your 3.1 is 3.1, and your 3.2 is 3.4 ;) In the -05 version I've moved this to the new appendix A. Note as mentioned in my reply to Fred, we actually have 3 cases here: - "d-s-ft" destination-first with fallthrough / backtracking - "d-s" destination-first - "s-d" source-first The way the draft is outlined uses "d-s-ft" to specify expected behaviour and has A.1 / A.2 describing translations to "d-s" & "s-d". -David - _______________________________________________ rtgwg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
