not aware of any patents beyond the Juniper declared one. - /hannes

On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 7:26 PM, Uma Chunduri <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Dear Chairs & WG,
>
> Not aware of any  non-disclosed IPRs related to this draft (yes,
> disclosures happened on the non-WG version of this draft, as pointed by
> Bruno below).
>
> --
> Uma C.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2017 1:22 AM
> To: Jeff Tantsura <[email protected]>; 'rtgwg-chairs' <
> [email protected]>
> Cc: [email protected]; RTGWG <[email protected]
> >
> Subject: RE: IPR call for draft-ietf-rtgwg-multihomed-prefix-lfa
>
> Hi chairs, all
>
> I'm not aware of non-disclosed IPR.
>
> Please note that 2 IPR had been disclosed on the individual version of
> this document https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/search/?submit=draft&id=
> draft-psarkar-rtgwg-multihomed-prefix-lfa
> which are not disclosed on https://datatracker.ietf.org/
> ipr/search/?submit=draft&id=draft-ietf-rtgwg-multihomed-prefix-lfa nor
> automatically referenced by the datatracker.
>
> Probably related, the datatracker document/replaces field seems to be left
> blank. Possibly, it could be filled with 2 drafts which have been merged:
> draft-psarkar-rtgwg-multihomed-prefix-lfa & draft-chunduri-rtgwg-lfa-
> extended-procedures
>
> Best regards,
> --Bruno
>
>
>  > -----Original Message-----
>  > From: Jeff Tantsura [mailto:[email protected]]  > Sent: Monday,
> October 23, 2017 11:30 PM  > To: RTGWG  > Cc: 'rtgwg-chairs';
> [email protected]
>  > Subject: IPR call for draft-ietf-rtgwg-multihomed-prefix-lfa
>  >
>  > Dear RTGWG,
>  >
>  > While authors are addressing shepherd’ comments, co-chairs would like
> to start IPR call on the  > draft.
>  >
>  > If you are listed as a document author or contributor, please respond
> to this  > email of whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR.
>  > The response needs to be sent to the RTGWG mailing list.
>  > The document will not advance to the next stage until a response has
> been  > received from each author and each individual that has contributed
> to the document.
>  >
>  > Thanks,
>  > Jeff and Chris
>  >
>  >
>
>
> ____________________________________________________________
> _____________________________________________________________
>
> Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations
> confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses,
> exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par
> erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les
> pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
> Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou
> falsifie. Merci.
>
> This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged
> information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed,
> used or copied without authorisation.
> If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and
> delete this message and its attachments.
> As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been
> modified, changed or falsified.
> Thank you.
>
>
_______________________________________________
rtgwg mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg

Reply via email to