what problem were you trying to solve? On Sat, Dec 9, 2017 at 11:32 AM, Khaled Omar <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi everyone, > > Please let me have the opportunity to ask all of you to reserve some time > in your agenda for the discussion of NEP and give it a priority on the kist > of your discussion as it will not take long time looking for something more > to add. > > I have confidence that this ID has more to add but the contents is just > the start of the new protocol. > > I hope I'm not bothering you by my question but I'm sure everyone of you > has something on mind to add to make the ID take the best shape and please > do not be afraid of posting any comment regarding the contents of the 2nd > version of the I-D. > > This long e-mail is to encourage you to participate and I'm sure the > discussion will be exciting and please do not understand as i'm pushing you > to participate, eventually it is up to you. > > P.S. After finding the appropriate area or wg for the discussion I will > stop sending e-mails to the ietf mailing list. > > Thanks, > > Khaled Omar > > > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: Numbering Exchange Protocol (NEP) ID. > From: Khaled Omar > To: [email protected] > CC: [email protected] > > > Hi everyone, > > > > Below is one of the IDs that I uploaded to the IETF and looking for > discussing it with the appropriate people and the appropriate area of > discussion. > > > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-omar-nep/ > > > > I tried to make it not so long so it can be read quickly and still clear > for everyone. > > > > *Regards,* > > > > *Khaled Omar* > > > > > >
_______________________________________________ rtgwg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
