Hi Roni, Thanks for the review and comments.
We have posted a updated version https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-rip-07, which contains the fixes for the two items that you listed below. Thanks, - Xufeng > -----Original Message----- > From: Roni Even [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Sunday, December 10, 2017 5:50 AM > To: [email protected] > Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] > Subject: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-rip-06 > > Reviewer: Roni Even > Review result: Ready with Nits > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review > Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the > IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call > comments. > > For more information, please see the FAQ at > > <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>. > > Document: draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-rip-?? > Reviewer: Roni Even > Review Date: 2017-12-10 > IETF LC End Date: 2017-12-12 > IESG Telechat date: 2018-01-11 > > Summary: > The document is ready for publication with nits as a standard track RFC > > Major issues: > > Minor issues: > > Nits/editorial comments: > > 1. in section 4 " type enumeration { > enum 1 { > description "IS-IS level 1 routes."; > } > enum 2 { > description "IS-IS level 1 routes."; > }" > > enum 2 is IS-IS level 2 routes > > 2. In Appendix A , the figure with eth0 and the data tree with eth1. Also > there is > "ipv4-prefix": "198.51.100.0/24" which are not in the figure > _______________________________________________ rtgwg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
