> Yes, I'm harsh, but this is because many persons already kindly explained the > problem to you, and you apparently don't listen. So, I have to retry harder.
Which proposals you are talking about? All? for some time some people felt not comfortable with IPv10 and the discussion has been stopped, but with KRP and NEP I received almost nothing thats why I'm asking for decisions regarding the discussion. -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: When the IETF can discuss drafts seriously? From: Stephane Bortzmeyer To: Khaled Omar CC: ietf ,rtgwg On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 08:46:29PM +0000, Khaled Omar wrote a message of 14 lines which said: > I noticed that the IETF participants gives only negative comments > regarding the submitted IDs, that is good in some cases if it is > true, but to ignore the positive side Calvin Coolidge, a former US president, apparently said that the important job in the governement was not to promote good bills, but to kill bad ones. There are already many protocols and many RFC. Adding more is not a goal in itself. > It's been long time on the rtgwg mailing list and didn't have any > technical discussion or comments for KRP and NEP or even an official > review. The problem at the IETF is that most people are too polite to explain to you the truth. So, let me try: your proposals are worthless and do not deserve a serious discussion. Yes, I'm harsh, but this is because many persons already kindly explained the problem to you, and you apparently don't listen. So, I have to retry harder.
_______________________________________________ rtgwg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
