Hi Kathleen, Thanks for pointing out the latest security template. We have updated the document with the new security template, and submitted a new version https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-rip-08. Please check if it is ok.
Regards, - Xufeng > -----Original Message----- > From: Kathleen Moriarty [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Monday, January 8, 2018 4:25 PM > To: The IESG <[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected]; Yingzhen Qu > <[email protected]>; [email protected]; [email protected]; > [email protected] > Subject: Kathleen Moriarty's Discuss on draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-rip-07: (with > DISCUSS) > > Kathleen Moriarty has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-rip-07: Discuss > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email > addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory > paragraph, however.) > > > Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html > for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. > > > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-rip/ > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > DISCUSS: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Thanks for your work on this draft. The current template for the security > consideration section was not used, could you please update the draft? I > believe > this is the current working version: > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6087bis-10#page-52 > > If there is a reason for not elaborating on data nodes per the template (too > many rw, etc.) a summary would be helpful. > > > _______________________________________________ rtgwg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
