Looks good. Thanks!

/a

On 2/13/18 11:10 AM, Acee Lindem (acee) wrote:
Hi Adam,
The -10 version includes IPv6 addresses in the examples.  Note that OSPF 
router-ids and area-ids are represented in dotted-quad format but are not 
necessarily IPv4 addresses (although it is common for the unique router-id to 
be based on an IPv4 loopback address).
Thanks,
Acee

On 2/8/18, 12:25 AM, "rtgwg on behalf of Adam Roach" <rtgwg-boun...@ietf.org on 
behalf of a...@nostrum.com> wrote:

     Adam Roach has entered the following ballot position for
     draft-ietf-rtgwg-ni-model-09: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
     email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
     introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
     for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
     https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rtgwg-ni-model/
----------------------------------------------------------------------
     COMMENT:
     ----------------------------------------------------------------------
All of the examples in §B.1 use IPv4 addresses exclusively. Please update these
     to use all-IPv6 or a mix of IPv4 and IPv6. See
     <https://www.iab.org/2016/11/07/iab-statement-on-ipv6/> for details.
_______________________________________________
     rtgwg mailing list
     rtgwg@ietf.org
     https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg

_______________________________________________
rtgwg mailing list
rtgwg@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg

Reply via email to