Hi Alvaro,
On 2/6/2018 12:17 PM, Alvaro Retana wrote:
---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- This document references/augments rfc7223. It should reference rfc7223bis instead.
This has been done in rev -06 of the document (kudos to Acee)
The examples in Appendix B still show the interfaces-state subtree, but the main text doesn't.
Acee handled this too in the update.
Are there any other changes in rfc7223bis that would impact this document?
Don't think so. Thanks for the comments! Lou _______________________________________________ rtgwg mailing list rtgwg@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
