Hi, Acee.

 

We have the trial of BNG (not the BGP) in several provinces. Test around BNG 
basically classifies as follows. We can go detailed discussion if you are 
interested in it.


Functionality

Basic test considering BNG-CP


BNG access function


COA/DM function


QoS function


Performance

Dial rate of users on BNG-CP/BNG-UP


Maximum Sessions on BNG-CP /BNG-UP


Reliability

BNG-CP  failure


BNG-UP reload


HA of BNG-UP


Channel of BNG-CP and BNG-UP failure

 

Gu Rong

gurong_c...@outlook.com <mailto:gurong_c...@outlook.com> 

gur...@chinamobile.com

发件人: Acee Lindem (acee) [mailto:a...@cisco.com] 
发送时间: 2018年3月9日 20:25
收件人: 顾 戎; rtgwg@ietf.org
抄送: victor.lopezalva...@telefonica.com; hushu...@chinamobile.com; r...@riw.us; 
gur...@chinamobile.com; sha...@ndzh.com
主题: Re: Report of CUSP design team research and welcome U involving into this 
work

 

Hi Gu, 

 

Have you implemented this BGP deployment model or is it still in the IETF draft 
and powerpoint phase? If it has been implemented, can you share any benchmarks? 

 

Acee  

 

From: rtgwg <rtgwg-boun...@ietf.org <mailto:rtgwg-boun...@ietf.org> > on behalf 
of 顾 戎 <gurong_c...@outlook.com <mailto:gurong_c...@outlook.com> >
Date: Thursday, March 8, 2018 at 11:32 PM
To: Routing WG <rtgwg@ietf.org <mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org> >
Cc: "victor.lopezalva...@telefonica.com 
<mailto:victor.lopezalva...@telefonica.com> " 
<victor.lopezalva...@telefonica.com <mailto:victor.lopezalva...@telefonica.com> 
>, "hushu...@chinamobile.com <mailto:hushu...@chinamobile.com> " 
<hushu...@chinamobile.com <mailto:hushu...@chinamobile.com> >, Russ White 
<r...@riw.us <mailto:r...@riw.us> >, "gur...@chinamobile.com 
<mailto:gur...@chinamobile.com> " <gur...@chinamobile.com 
<mailto:gur...@chinamobile.com> >, Susan Hares <sha...@ndzh.com 
<mailto:sha...@ndzh.com> >
Subject: Report of CUSP design team research and welcome U involving into this 
work

 

Hi, dear all.

 

Here we give a short introduction of CUSP design team research work. Recently 
CloudCO project on CU separation BNG device has been approved. Now WT-384 is 
now approved and officially TR-384. In TR-384, the CU-separated BNG 
architecture is provided with control plane (BNG-CP) and user plane (BNG-UP) 
separation. This new architecture brings several advantages such as centralized 
session management, flexible address allocation, and high scalability and 
cost-efficient redundancy and so on.

 

Besides the architecture, there are reserved work to be done with details. Here 
we present several related drafts.

(1) One is the "Information model of control plane and user plane separation 
BNG" which describes the information model of BNG-CP and BNG-UP in order to 
form the related data model.

 
<https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-cuspdt-rtgwg-cu-separation-infor-model-00.txt>
 
https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-cuspdt-rtgwg-cu-separation-infor-model-00.txt


(2) Another is "Deployment Model of Control Plane and User Plane Separated BNG" 
introducing the deployment of CU-Separation BNG.

 
<https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-cuspdt-rtgwg-cu-separation-bng-deployment-01.txt>
 
https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-cuspdt-rtgwg-cu-separation-bng-deployment-01.txt

 

(3) Besides the draft "Requirement for the protocol of the control plane and 
user planes separation BNG" involving the communication protocol requirement of 
BNG-CP and BNG-UP.

 
<https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-cuspdt-rtgwg-cusp-requirements-01.txt>
 
https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-cuspdt-rtgwg-cusp-requirements-01.txt

 

Any comments are welcomed.

 

Gu Rong

 <mailto:gurong_c...@outlook.com> gurong_c...@outlook.com

 <mailto:gur...@chinamobile.com> gur...@chinamobile.com

 

 

_______________________________________________
rtgwg mailing list
rtgwg@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg

Reply via email to