Hi Sue,
Please use RFC3443 as the normative for TTL behavior. Cheers, Jeff From: rtgwg <[email protected]> on behalf of Susan Hares <[email protected]> Date: Wednesday, April 18, 2018 at 09:19 To: RTGWG <[email protected]> Cc: <[email protected]>, 'Amit Dass' <[email protected]> Subject: Advice Requetss -for I2RS Rib YANG model Greetings: The I2RS WG would like some advice. Is there ever a case when doing label swap you would ever want to decrease the TTL at the same time? Our initial I2RS RIB (draft-ietf-i2rs-rib-data-model-10) had added this 3 years ago due to comments. However, we are question now whether this is valid. We have asked the mpls wg, i2rs wg, and rtgwg wg – to see if anyone knows if this is a useful feature. Thank you, Susan Hares Co-chair I2RS WG _______________________________________________ rtgwg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
_______________________________________________ rtgwg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
