I agree we should adopt the draft, and then fix the issues with it. Recall I am concerned as to whether all the IPR has been logged in the tracker.
https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtgwg/current/msg07011.html -Stewart Sent from my iPad > On 9 Aug 2018, at 16:29, Chris Bowers <[email protected]> wrote: > > RTGWG, > > Jeff and I think it makes sense to adopt > draft-bashandy-rtgwg-segment-routing-ti-lfa > as a working group document. > > There has been a lot of useful discussion about this draft on the list.. > However, the text of the > draft has not been modified to reflect a good deal of valid feedback from > reviewers. > We intend to address this issue if and when the draft becomes a working group > document. > > Please indicate your support or opposition to the adoption of this draft. > > If you are listed as a document author or contributor, please respond to this > email stating > whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR. The response needs to be > sent to the > RTGWG mailing list. The document will not advance to the next stage until a > response has > been received from each author and each individual that has contributed to > the document. > > At this point, the document has the following IPR disclosure associated with > it. > https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/3068/ > > This adoption poll will end on August 24th. > > Thanks, > Chris and Jeff > > > _______________________________________________ > rtgwg mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
_______________________________________________ rtgwg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
