Hi Greg,

Thanks for your question.

This draft defines the QoS base modules of Policy, Classiier, Action, Target. 
QoS base module has been augmented with Diffserv module.
This is described in Section 1.
For MPLS, similar modules will be augmented as part of separate draft. This has 
not been specifically mentioned but can be added.

Regards,
Aseem

From: rtgwg <[email protected]> on behalf of Greg Mirsky 
<[email protected]>
Date: Saturday, December 1, 2018 at 8:38 AM
To: Jeff Tantsura <[email protected]>
Cc: rtgwg-chairs <[email protected]>, RTGWG <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: WG adoption poll for draft-asechoud-rtgwg-qos-model-07

Dear Authors,
thank you for taking on this work. I have a question rather philosophical than 
technical. The title of the draft suggests that the models are generic though 
they are based on DSCP field of the IP header. Have you considered extending 
models to include the Traffic Class field of MPLS Label element? And if not, 
then clarify that the models are for networks with IP data plane?

Regards,
Greg

On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 6:31 PM Jeff Tantsura 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Dear RTGWG,

The authors have requested RTGWG to adopt draft-asechoud-rtgwg-qos-model as the 
working group document.
The draft has received support during IETF101 meeting, authors have addressed 
all the comments received.

Please indicate support or no-support by December 15, 2018.

If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond to this
email stating of whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR.
The response needs to be sent to the RTGWG mailing list. The document will not
advance to the next stage until a response has been received from each
author and each individual that has contributed to the document..

Cheers,
Jeff & Chris
_______________________________________________
rtgwg mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
_______________________________________________
rtgwg mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg

Reply via email to