Hi! I think so. The important part is that it doesn’t say anything about derivative work. :-)
Thanks! Alvaro. On February 6, 2019 at 4:18:55 PM, Linda Dunbar ([email protected]) wrote: Alvaro, Thanks for noticing this incorrect boilerplate which was copied from other documents. So the answer is NOT Intended. Is this the right boilerplate? ----------------- Status of this Memo This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79. Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups. Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet Drafts. Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress." The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html Linda *From:* Alvaro Retana [mailto:[email protected]] *Sent:* Wednesday, February 06, 2019 2:57 PM *To:* [email protected]; Routing WG < [email protected]> *Cc:* RTGWG <[email protected]>; Jeff Tantsura <[email protected]> *Subject:* Re: RTGWG adoption call for draft-dm-net2cloud-problem-statement Hi! The boilerplate in this document (under “Status of this Memo”) reads: "This document may not be modified, and derivative works of it may not be created, except to publish it as an RFC and to translate it into languages other than English.” With that text, the document cannot be adopted by the WG. rfc5378 says: "The right to produce derivative works must be granted in order for an IETF working group to accept a Contribution as a working group document or otherwise work on it.” Authors: is the text what you intend? I suspect it may just be a leftover from an old ID template. Thanks! Alvaro. On January 24, 2019 at 11:34:11 AM, Jeff Tantsura ([email protected]) wrote: Dear RTGWG, The authors have requested the RTGWG to adopt draft-dm-net2cloud-problem-statement as the working group documents. There was good support during the last IETF meeting. Please indicate support or no-support by February 10, 2019. If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond to this email stating of whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR. The response needs to be sent to the RTGWG mailing list. The document will not advance to the next stage until a response has been received from each author and each individual that has contributed to the document. Thanks, Jeff & Chris _______________________________________________ rtgwg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
_______________________________________________ rtgwg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
