Francois/co-authors, Thanks for addressing the comments. Please update and publish the updated draft.
Thanks! Cheers, Jeff On Jul 24, 2019, 1:22 PM -0400, Francois Clad (fclad) <[email protected]>, wrote: > Hi Stewart, > > Thank you for pointing that out. > > The term circuits in the third column refers to bi-directional links. For the > sake of clarity, we propose to replace it with “links” and multiply all > values in the third column by 2. > > It also appears that a glitch occurred when the link/node ratios were > reported in this table 1. > > Below is the updated table. > > +-------------+------------+------------+------------+------------+ > | Network | Nodes | Links |Link-to-Node| SRLG info? | > | | | | Ratio | | > +-------------+------------+------------+------------+------------+ > | T1 | 408 | 1330 | 3.26 | Yes | > +-------------+------------+------------+------------+------------+ > | T2 | 587 | 2166 | 3.69 | No | > +-------------+------------+------------+------------+------------+ > | T3 | 93 | 802 | 8.62 | Yes | > +-------------+------------+------------+------------+------------+ > | T4 | 247 | 786 | 3.18 | Yes | > +-------------+------------+------------+------------+------------+ > | T5 | 34 | 192 | 5.65 | Yes | > +-------------+------------+------------+------------+------------+ > | T6 | 50 | 156 | 3.12 | No | > +-------------+------------+------------+------------+------------+ > | T7 | 82 | 586 | 7.15 | No | > +-------------+------------+------------+------------+------------+ > | T8 | 35 | 82 | 2.34 | Yes | > +-------------+------------+------------+------------+------------+ > | T9 | 177 | 2742 | 15.49 | Yes | > +-------------+------------+------------+------------+------------+ > > Regards, > Francois > > On 22/07/2019 12:00, "Stewart Bryant" <[email protected]> wrote: > > I would like to understand what Table 1 in > draft-ietf-rtgwg-segment-routing-ti-lfa is telling us. > > It uses the terms links and circuits without distinguishing between the > two. I could speculate that a circuit is a group of links, but then the > ratio of nodes to circuits in T1 seems far too low at less than 1:1 in > network T1. > > Then the node to link ratio sounds quite high with fan outs of 84:1 in T2. > > Please could you explain what you mean by circuits and links in this table. > > What I would like to know is the average ratio of nodes to neighbours, > and the number of parallel links per neighbour. > > Best regards > > Stewart > > > > > _______________________________________________ > rtgwg mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
_______________________________________________ rtgwg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
