Yimin, Thank you for bringing this up! Authors - please do address Yimin’s comments.
Cheers, Jeff On Jan 15, 2020, 11:23 AM -0800, Yimin Shen <[email protected]>, wrote: > Hi authors, > > I’d like to suggest this draft to reference RFC 8679. > > In particular, RFC 8679 as a generic EP framework with a lot of general > discussions (see the points below), which are applicable to both MPLS and > IPv6 data plane, and all types of transport tunnels. However, this draft > seems to have almost no consideration or discussion on these topics. I don’t > think the draft needs to repeat these discussions, but I suggest to add a > section(s) to discuss these points generally by referencing RFC 8679. > > > • general scope and requirements > • transport layer failure/protection vs. service layer failure/protection > • applicability > • failure detection mechanisms > • egress node protection > • egress link protection > • relationship between EP and global repair > • co-existing of different types of transport tunnels and bypass tunnels > • security > > > > Thanks, > > -- Yimin Shen > Juniper Networks > > _______________________________________________ > rtgwg mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
_______________________________________________ rtgwg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
