Hi Huaimo,
thank you for your response. I couldn't find a response to me from the
authors, nor an explanation of how they have addressed my comments. Perhaps
you can help with that. Also, the note you've referenced was not addressed
to me, probably you've meant to reference another email.
Hence, I cannot conclude that my comments were considered and resolved. As
I've noted, the problems I've pointed to were serious enough to require
resolution before this work is adopted by the group.
I much appreciate WG Chairs consideration and suggestions to me and the
authors on how we can proceed.

Regards,
Greg

On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 6:26 AM Huaimo Chen <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Hi Greg,
>
>     The comments received, including yours, have been addressed in the
> updated draft posted on March 1, 2020.
>
> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtgwg/LD2mKe0-I8DjxW1vHrOmSnmg9gg/
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hu-rtgwg-srv6-egress-protection/
>
>
> Best Regards,
> Huaimo
> ------------------------------
> *From:* rtgwg <[email protected]> on behalf of Greg Mirsky <
> [email protected]>
> *Sent:* Thursday, March 19, 2020 1:40 AM
> *To:* rtgwg-chairs <[email protected]>; RTGWG <[email protected]>
> *Subject:* Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtgwg-srv6-egress-protection-00.txt
>
> Dear Chris and Jeff,
> as I've mentioned, my comments were not acknowledged during the WGAP. In
> my comment I've indicated that I consider the problem fundamental and don't
> believe that without addressing it the solution is plausible. My comments
> were not acknowledged and only earlier today I received a very terse
> reference to a potential resolution that I didn't have time to review. And
> without my acknowledgement and confirmation the WG draft has been
> published. I don't think that demonstrates the professional courtesy.
>
> Regards,
> Greg
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ---------
> From: <[email protected]>
> Date: Wed, Mar 18, 2020, 22:02
> Subject: I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtgwg-srv6-egress-protection-00.txt
> To: <[email protected]>
> Cc: <[email protected]>
>
>
>
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
> directories.
> This draft is a work item of the Routing Area Working Group WG of the IETF.
>
>         Title           : SRv6 Path Egress Protection
>         Authors         : Zhibo Hu
>                           Huanan Chen
>                           Huaimo Chen
>                           Peng Wu
>                           Mehmet Toy
>                           Chang Cao
>                           Lei Liu
>                           Xufeng Liu
>         Filename        : draft-ietf-rtgwg-srv6-egress-protection-00.txt
>         Pages           : 16
>         Date            : 2020-03-18
>
> Abstract:
>    This document describes protocol extensions for protecting the egress
>    node of a Segment Routing for IPv6 (SRv6) path or tunnel.
>
>
>
> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rtgwg-srv6-egress-protection/
> <https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdatatracker.ietf.org%2Fdoc%2Fdraft-ietf-rtgwg-srv6-egress-protection%2F&data=02%7C01%7Chuaimo.chen%40futurewei.com%7C7e9d4fdb639c48a4f92d08d7cbc804df%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C1%7C637201932257969222&sdata=dOQeocqfX1WNFJtntyxweW7xCVkET%2FrCdI5lDzu5sX8%3D&reserved=0>
>
> There are also htmlized versions available at:
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-rtgwg-srv6-egress-protection-00
> <https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ftools.ietf.org%2Fhtml%2Fdraft-ietf-rtgwg-srv6-egress-protection-00&data=02%7C01%7Chuaimo.chen%40futurewei.com%7C7e9d4fdb639c48a4f92d08d7cbc804df%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C1%7C637201932257969222&sdata=MCWCFk0cRfgQzE41bHgHIdpFhMcKe%2FU1Vmjz8HTebfw%3D&reserved=0>
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-rtgwg-srv6-egress-protection-00
> <https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdatatracker.ietf.org%2Fdoc%2Fhtml%2Fdraft-ietf-rtgwg-srv6-egress-protection-00&data=02%7C01%7Chuaimo.chen%40futurewei.com%7C7e9d4fdb639c48a4f92d08d7cbc804df%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C1%7C637201932257979190&sdata=bTHV1dubGGrjJ5XdZ1gaavtL6wHVKVHjq6W3LU271Hs%3D&reserved=0>
>
>
> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of
> submission
> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org
> <https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Ftools..ietf.org%2F&data=02%7C01%7Chuaimo.chen%40futurewei.com%7C7e9d4fdb639c48a4f92d08d7cbc804df%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C1%7C637201932257979190&sdata=Ak1WRk5blrw888vOLt6ljXRFgK08GIDFQMoZfD%2FXGys%3D&reserved=0>
> .
>
> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rtgwg mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
> <https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ietf.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Frtgwg&data=02%7C01%7Chuaimo.chen%40futurewei.com%7C7e9d4fdb639c48a4f92d08d7cbc804df%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C1%7C637201932257989133&sdata=p%2F1%2BGzvGeo1JCYmXAvhnUYpzJRKxupxoZKlszrVcdGg%3D&reserved=0>
>
_______________________________________________
rtgwg mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg

Reply via email to