The prefixes should probably include "qos-" and an abbreviated model descriptor. For example, qos-class, qos-actn, qos-pol, qos-trgt, qos-q-pol, qos-sched, and qos-diffsrv. Thanks, Acee
On 4/15/20, 7:17 AM, "rtgwg on behalf of t petch" <[email protected] on behalf of [email protected]> wrote: Aseem I would like you to think more deeply about the YANG prefix. Prefix need to be easy to use, to read, view and need to be unique, ideally across the IETF. At the same time, they need to be compact, especially when used in lengthy references such as when statements (as RFC8407 says, they SHOULD be short); and it is helpful when they show which part of the IETF they relate to; thus across many traffic engineering modules you find te... being used. I think that your choices do not meet such requirements. 'policy' could be anywhere, from tcp to art to routing. In fact there is a more widely used routing policy model already and it chooses 'rtpol' which I think a sound choice. You have seven and I think at the very least they should be recognisably part of the same set, starting with the same few letters. 'qos' perhaps. And after that another two, three or four letters to indicate which part of QoS, such as 'pol' for policy. I would urge you to consider this now. It may mean hundreds of text changes to the I-D but that is better done now that at Last Call. Tom Petch On 01/01/1970 00:00, [email protected] wrote: > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. > This draft is a work item of the Routing Area Working Group WG of the IETF. > > Title : YANG Model for QoS > Authors : Aseem Choudhary > Mahesh Jethanandani > Norm Strahle > Ebben Aries > Ing-Wher Chen > Filename : draft-ietf-rtgwg-qos-model-01.txt > Pages : 90 > Date : 2020-04-09 > > Abstract: > This document describes a YANG model for Quality of Service (QoS) > configuration and operational parameters. > > > The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rtgwg-qos-model/ > > There are also htmlized versions available at: > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-rtgwg-qos-model-01 > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-rtgwg-qos-model-01 > > A diff from the previous version is available at: > https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=3Ddraft-ietf-rtgwg-qos-model-01 > > > Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission > until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. > > Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: > ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ > > > _______________________________________________ > rtgwg mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg > _______________________________________________ rtgwg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg _______________________________________________ rtgwg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
