Hi Acee,
> On Jul 7, 2020, at 11:16 AM, Acee Lindem (acee)
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Yes. I’d say we should just use the ip-prefix type from RFC 6021. This type
> has the right semantics.
>
> However, I’m wondering how we do the mask-length-lower checking with the
> union. I imagine it should be possible.
>
How would you test the constraint on mask-length-upper if you use ip-prefix?
—John
_______________________________________________
rtgwg mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
