Hi Robin, I’d like to see actual numbers, as per deployment. It would really help operators to better understand pros/cons of a deployment and make a better informed decision.
Thanks! Regards, Jeff > On Jul 27, 2020, at 08:50, Lizhenbin <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi Tony, > In the deployment of SRv6, the overhead is truly an issue which is always > proposed. Please refer to the "3. Typical Application Scenarios" and "4. > Analysis of SRH Overhead" of the following draft: > > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-cheng-spring-shorter-srv6-sid-requirement-01 > > It provides some typical scenarios which introduce the challenges of SRv6 > overhead and the analysis of SRH overhead is provided. > > Since SRv6 can be deployed incrementally. We think the challenges of SRv6 > overhead will increased gradually and the possible solution can become mature > in the process. One important thing is > that the SRv6 compression solution also must be compatible with SRv6 and can > be deployed incrementally. > > > > Best Regards, > Zhenbin (Robin) > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > rtgwg mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
_______________________________________________ rtgwg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
