Hi Robert, I think we should work as a prerequisite on drawing the boundaries between the regions to separate one from another but the issue is which area belongs to which region, some may need to join a specific area that is difficult for them to do.
But regarding the added values, attacking BGP could be dangerous and the migration to KRP should be smooth. Best Regards, Khaled Omar Get Outlook for iOS<https://aka.ms/o0ukef> ________________________________ From: Robert Raszuk <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, August 6, 2020 12:16:57 PM To: Stewart Bryant <[email protected]> Cc: Khaled Omar <[email protected]>; rtgwg <[email protected]> Subject: Re: KRP ID Discussion. Hi Stewart, I hear what you are saying and politically speaking I understand your comment. Not that I would agree - but this does not matter. But just thinking on the technical level I do not understand it. Are you saying that maybe in 2030 it would not be legally possible to create a link of some form (physical or virtual) and run single IGP between US and Europe ? Or between EMEA and Japan ? Or EMEA to Africa ? Are you saying that global operators would have to artificially divide their networks into chunks ? And who would control what goes between such chunks ? ITU-T ? What about new zoo of satellites just launched to precisely offer Internet without any geo boundaries ? Would we need to now map earth continents to orbit and create "fences" in the space as well ? Sorry but not only that would be end of the Internet but possibly end of Google, MS, FB and other global operators and enterprises too. Or maybe the idea is to kill open Internet and still allow enterprises to be global and take most of the transit ? Best, R. On Thu, Aug 6, 2020 at 12:02 PM Stewart Bryant <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Robert I make no comment on the draft, but whilst what you say is currently true, the state of world politics seem to make the current decoupling of the various topologies that we enjoy at the moment less likely to continue than was the case a few years back. The political actions of governments trumps (if you excuse the unfortunate pun) the preferences of the engineers and accountants. ITU-T SG2 (numbering) has a list of Middle East cases of traffic routing issues based on politics, the EU GDPR rules, the developing countries' concern over traffic patterns, the actions of the current US administration, all take us in the direction of the application of geo and political considerations to traffic routing. Regrettably, the writing is on the wall for restrictions to become normalised and built into the traffic planning rules, and that will push them into the routing system. Stewart > On 6 Aug 2020, at 10:15, Robert Raszuk > <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > Khaled, > > Physical network topologies do not follow geo nor political boundaries. Any > solution based on the above is simply not practical. > > Best, > R.
_______________________________________________ rtgwg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
