No, these are the ones who think that your browser should be able to tell Windows what order to do the disk queue.
John > On Aug 14, 2020, at 20:37, Joe Touch <[email protected]> wrote: > > This WG appears to be revisiting the issues of the expired trigtran wg. It > might be useful to understand why that did not succeed and whether you are > asking the same question twice and expecting a different answer. > > Joe > >> On Aug 12, 2020, at 9:25 PM, Lizhenbin <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Hi Folks, >> >> The APN mailing list has been created. If you have interest in the work, >> please subscribe. >> >> List address: [email protected] >> Archive: https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/apn >> To subscribe: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apn >> >> Purpose: >> This email list is the discussion list for the Application-aware Networking >> (APN). Application-aware Networking is a mechanism whereby traffic flows can >> be steered and routed within the network to ensure that the specific service >> levels needed by applications can be delivered. >> >> This list belongs to IETF area: RTG >> >> >> Look forward to going on to have more discussion in the mailing list. >> >> >> >> Best regards, >> Zhenbin (Robin) >> >> >> >> ________________________________________ >> 发件人: Architecture-discuss [[email protected]] 代表 >> Lizhenbin [[email protected]] >> 发送时间: 2020年7月29日 0:17 >> 收件人: [email protected]; [email protected] >> 抄送: [email protected] >> 主题: [arch-d] APN (Application-aware Networking) Side Meeting >> >> Hi All, >> We will have the APN side meeting at 12:30 - 14:00 UTC on July 30 >> (Thursday). The agenda and the WebEx information is provided in the >> following link. >> https://github.com/APN-Community/IETF108-Side-Meeting-APN >> >> There has been several similar work like APN such as SPUD and PLUS. Recently >> Network Token work was also proposed. The side meeting is to try to clarify >> the scope of APN comparing with other work. The possible usecases are also >> proposed for the APN work. Another goal of the side meeting is to clarify >> the security and privacy issues which are always proposed against such >> application-ware networking work. In RTGWG session held yesterday, the >> presentation of APN work discussed the possible scenarios related with the >> security and privacy issues. The following slides is for your reference: >> https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/108/slides/slides-108-rtgwg-8-rtgwg-apn6-01 >> >> Since it is a complex cross-area work and there is much background >> information, wish you could join the side meeting if you have interest in >> the work and your comments and suggestions are appreciated. >> >> >> Best Regards, >> Daniel & Zhenbin (Robin) >> _______________________________________________ >> Architecture-discuss mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/architecture-discuss >> _______________________________________________ >> Architecture-discuss mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/architecture-discuss > > _______________________________________________ > Architecture-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/architecture-discuss _______________________________________________ rtgwg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
