HI Roman, Thank you for your review and comments. Please see my answers inline.
Thanks, Yingzhen > On Aug 10, 2021, at 12:31 PM, Roman Danyliw via Datatracker > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Roman Danyliw has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-rtgwg-policy-model-30: No Objection > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all > email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this > introductory paragraph, however.) > > > Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html > for more information about DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. > > > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rtgwg-policy-model/ > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > COMMENT: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Thanks to Dan Harkins for the SECDIR review. > > ** Section 5. > > If none of the policy statement conditions > are satisfied, then evaluation of the current policy definition > stops, and the next policy definition in the chain is evaluated. > > Is it worth mentioning in this paragraph that various implementation specific > optimizations may be possible. For example, Section 4.2 notes policy match > conditions. If the match condition is ALL and the first condition is not > satisfied, is it necessary to evaluate the next policy statement? [Yingzhen]: Personally I don’t think it’s really necessary. It’s up to implementations, like in your example, a good implementation will “break” out of the comparison if there is “False” in condition ALL. > > ** Section 8. The text helpful notes the read sensitivity of > “/routing-policy/policy-definitions/policy-definition” with “Additionally, > > policies and their attendant conditions and actions should be considered > proprietary and disclosure could be used to ascertain partners, customers, and > supplies.” It seems like “defined-sets/prefix-sets” could also reveal these > relationships with partners, customers or suppliers. [Yingzhen]: The policy-definition may refer to a prefix-sets, and it definitely reveal more information. You can config a list of prefix-sets, but not use them in any policy definition. > > > _______________________________________________ rtgwg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
