Hi Murray,
On 8/12/21, 3:14 AM, "Murray Kucherawy via Datatracker" <[email protected]>
wrote:
Murray Kucherawy has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-rtgwg-policy-model-30: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rtgwg-policy-model/
----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't think you need the BCP 14 boilerplate in the prose part of this
document. You have exactly one of its keywords, at the bottom of Section
4.4,
and you could find a way to say that normatively without bringing in BCP
14.
Your choice, of course.
But we have a number of normative statements in the ietf-routing-policy.yang
itself. We think it is better to leave the reference.
Thanks,
Acee
_______________________________________________
rtgwg mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
