Hi Acee I just read the draft and it looks very good.
Just one comment on the Appendix A as those technologies are obsolete I think we can remove. Kind Regards Gyan On Sat, Apr 2, 2022 at 4:48 PM Acee Lindem (acee) <acee= [email protected]> wrote: > Chairs, > > This is the version for which I'd like to request WG adoption. I believe > now I have not only changed the terminology to be inclusive but made it > significantly more consistent throughout the document. I've also reworded > to avoid the usage of "black hole" for an unreachable destination. > > I've also made the document more readable by eliminating awkward sentence > construction and run-on sentences connected by semicolons. > > Thanks, > Acee > > > > On 4/2/22, 4:42 PM, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > A new version of I-D, draft-addogra-rtgwg-vrrp-rfc5798bis-06.txt > has been successfully submitted by Acee Lindem and posted to the > IETF repository. > > Name: draft-addogra-rtgwg-vrrp-rfc5798bis > Revision: 06 > Title: Virtual Router Redundancy Protocol (VRRP) Version > 3 for IPv4 and IPv6 > Document date: 2022-04-02 > Group: Individual Submission > Pages: 40 > URL: > https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-addogra-rtgwg-vrrp-rfc5798bis-06.txt > Status: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-addogra-rtgwg-vrrp-rfc5798bis/ > Html: > https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-addogra-rtgwg-vrrp-rfc5798bis-06.html > Htmlized: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-addogra-rtgwg-vrrp-rfc5798bis > Diff: > https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-addogra-rtgwg-vrrp-rfc5798bis-06 > > Abstract: > This document defines the Virtual Router Redundancy Protocol (VRRP) > for IPv4 and IPv6. It is version three (3) of the protocol, and it > is based on VRRP (version 2) for IPv4 that is defined in RFC 3768 > and > in "Virtual Router Redundancy Protocol for IPv6". VRRP specifies an > election protocol that dynamically assigns responsibility for a > virtual router to one of the VRRP routers on a LAN. The VRRP router > controlling the IPv4 or IPv6 address(es) associated with a virtual > router is called the VRRP Active Router, and it forwards packets > sent > to these IPv4 or IPv6 addresses. VRRP Active Routers are configured > with virtual IPv4 or IPv6 addresses, and VRRP Backup Routers infer > the address family of the virtual addresses being carried based on > the transport protocol. Within a VRRP router, the virtual routers > in > each of the IPv4 and IPv6 address families are a domain unto > themselves and do not overlap. The election process provides > dynamic > failover in the forwarding responsibility should the Active Router > become unavailable. For IPv4, the advantage gained from using VRRP > is a higher-availability default path without requiring > configuration > of dynamic routing or router discovery protocols on every end-host. > For IPv6, the advantage gained from using VRRP for IPv6 is a quicker > switchover to Backup Routers than can be obtained with standard IPv6 > Neighbor Discovery mechanisms. > > The VRRP terminology has been updated conform to inclusive language > guidelines for IETF technologies. This document obsoletes VRRP > Version 3 [RFC5798]. > > > > > The IETF Secretariat > > > > _______________________________________________ > rtgwg mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg > -- <http://www.verizon.com/> *Gyan Mishra* *Network Solutions A**rchitect * *Email [email protected] <[email protected]>* *M 301 502-1347*
_______________________________________________ rtgwg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
