Hi Donald,
From: rtgwg <[email protected]> on behalf of Donald Eastlake
<[email protected]>
Date: Thursday, July 14, 2022 at 2:16 PM
To: Dhruv Dhody <[email protected]>
Cc: Routing WG <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Working Group Adoption Call for
draft-addogra-rtgwg-vrrp-rfc5798bis-11
I support adoption.
I think the Abstract should be trimmed down a bit. It is very long.
I don’t think it is that long considering the scope of the document. I did
change “transport protocol” to
“IP protocol version” since “transport protocol” is usually used to refer to
“Layer-4” protocols. The second
paragraph is needed to set the context for the BIS document.
I agree with Dhruv that the IANA Considerations could use a little tweaking.
While I do not think it essential that the registries be named, it might be
useful to some future reader. It should be consistent and list the IPv4 VRRP
MAC addresses. I'm also not sure why the MAC addresses are listed as "reserved"
while everything else is "assigned". MAC addresses under the IANA OUI are fully
under the authority of IANA and assigned for particular uses like other
codepoints. Here is a suggested replacement IANA Considerations section:
IANA Considerations
In the "IPv4 Multicast Address Space Registry", IANA has assigned
the IPv4 multicast address 224.0.0.18 for VRRP.
In the "IPv6 Multicast Address Space Registry", IANA has assigned
the IPv6 link-local scope multicast address FF02:0:0:0:0:0:0:12 for
VRRP for IPv6.
In the "IANA Unicast 48-bit MAC Addresses" registry, IANA has
assigned blocks of Ethernet unicast addresses as follows (in hex):
IPv4 VRRP 00-00-5E-00-01-00 to 00-00-5E-00-01-FF
IPv6 VRRP 00-00-5E-00-02-00 to 00-00-5E-00-02-FF
I’ve taken your suggestion and added the appropriate references.
In the "Local Network Control Block (224.0.0.0 - 224.0.0.255
(224.0.0/24))" of the "IPv4 Multicast Address Space Registry"
[RFC5771], IANA has assigned the IPv4 multicast address 224.0.0.18
for VRRP.
In the "Link-Local Scope Multicast Addresses" block of the "IPv6
Multicast Address Space Registry" [RFC3307], IANA has assigned the
IPv6 link-local scope multicast address FF02:0:0:0:0:0:0:12 for VRRP
for IPv6.
In the "IANA Unicast 48-bit MAC Addresses" registry [RFC7042], IANA
has assigned blocks of Ethernet unicast addresses as follows (in
hexadecimal):
IPv4 VRRP 00-00-5E-00-01-00 to 00-00-5E-00-01-FF
IPv6 VRRP 00-00-5E-00-02-00 to 00-00-5E-00-02-FF
Thanks,
Acee
Thanks,
Donald
===============================
Donald E. Eastlake 3rd +1-508-333-2270 (cell)
2386 Panoramic Circle, Apopka, FL 32703 USA
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Thanks,
Donald
===============================
Donald E. Eastlake 3rd +1-508-333-2270 (cell)
2386 Panoramic Circle, Apopka, FL 32703 USA
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
On Thu, Jul 14, 2022 at 9:07 AM Dhruv Dhody
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Hi,
I support adoption.
Now that we are doing bis, could we improve the IANA section a bit -- it would
help to identify the registry and explicit instructions to update the
references, for instance. Also for ethernet, isn't IPv4 allocation missing ->
"00-01-00 to 00-01-FF"?
Section "11.2.6. 0 - Reserved" and the VRP packet with the field being called
"0" but the description as "This reserved field MUST be set to zero..." reads
wrong. I suggest either using "reserved" in the figure and section title or
just using MBZ - must be zero and not call it reserved.
Thanks!
Dhruv
On Fri, Jul 1, 2022 at 8:23 AM Yingzhen Qu
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Dear RTGWG,
This email begins a working group adoption call for the following draft:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-addogra-rtgwg-vrrp-rfc5798bis/
Please indicate your support or objections by July 17th, 2022.
Authors, please respond to the list indicating whether you are aware of any IPR
that applies to the draft..
Thanks,
Yingzhen
_______________________________________________
rtgwg mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
_______________________________________________
rtgwg mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
_______________________________________________
rtgwg mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
