Given that RTGWG is the dispatch WG for the RTG area and that this proposal includes some interesting new concepts, I think RTG would be a fine home for the work.
It is however largely up to the WG Chairs and AD whether they accept the item, but as far as I can see it is within scope. - Stewart > On 20 Aug 2022, at 07:18, Schanzenbach, Martin <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Hi rtgwg! > > I hope this email finds you all in good health. > > Before we submit it to the Independent Stream (or go to dispatch), we wanted > to touch ground with you if you or a WG you could point us to would be > interested in our specification > on R5N, a protocol for randomised recursive routing for restricted-route > networks. [1] > It is a distributed hash table protocol and we currently have two independent > implementations. > The document is not finished but in a readable state and feedback is very > welcome either way. > > Thank you and have a nice day > Martin > > [1] https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-schanzen-r5n-00.html > _______________________________________________ > rtgwg mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg _______________________________________________ rtgwg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
