Ines, See the explanations below: From: Ines Robles <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2023 3:58 PM To: Linda Dunbar <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: Re: Rtgdir early review of draft-ietf-rtgwg-net2cloud-problem-statement-22
Hi Linda, Thank you for addressing my comments, please find my answer below, On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 10:10 PM Linda Dunbar <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: * Some mitigations include references, but It would be nice to add references to all of them. [Ines] what do you think about this comment? * It would be nice to add in each mitigation, the costs of applying it. [Linda] the cost depends on the service providers. It is out of the scope of this document to describe the cost. [Ines] Ok, but the abstract states that it covers the costs as follows: "This document also describes the mitigation practices for getting around the identified problems and discusses the benefits vs. costs of the practices." If the costs are not covered, maybe some further clarification is needed. [Linda] That is a valid point. Will remove. * What means a site capacity goes dark? [Linda] Meaning the capacity goes to zero [Ines] Thank you, Then, maybe it can be changed to indicate that the capacity goes to zero? [Linda] Yes, changed per your suggestion. * The mentioned problems and mitigations applies for 5G Standalone and Non-Standalone deployments options? [Linda] The 3GPP’s Edge Computing is for 5G only. [Ines] Maybe you can add this as clarification, something like "..for standalone deployments option...", What do you think? [Linda] Does “Non-Standalone deployment” indicate mixed 4G and 5G? Thank you, Ines.
_______________________________________________ rtgwg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
