Hi WGs，
I have reviewed this draft. I think this is a simple and effective egress
protection solution，with a tiny data path extension could avoid the complexity
of configurations and protocol extensions of traditional egress protection.
So I support the wg adoption.
> From:"Weiqiang Cheng"<[email protected]>
> Date:Wed, May 24, 2023, 17:26
> Subject:Could we ask for WG adoption of
> draft-cheng-rtgwg-srv6-multihome-egress-protection?
> To:<[email protected]>,<[email protected]>
> Cc:<[email protected]>
> Dear Chairs and WG, Draft
> [draft-cheng-rtgwg-srv6-multihome-egress-protection-03] provides stateless
> and plan-free fast failover for multi-homed egress scenarios. It was
> presented at RTGWG during the IETF115 meeting.After addressing all comments
> received, we also presented it in the Spring Working Group during IETF 116
> according to the Chair's suggestion.The feedback is positive. Now we authors
> believe that the solution is mature and stable, and hope to ask for WG
> adoption.Any comments are welcome. B.R.Weiqiang Cheng
_______________________________________________
rtgwg mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
