One of the arguments made in these documents seems to be that by using
this technology you can reduce latency by skipping the DNS step.
I do not see how that works. Are you assuming that applications will
have the anycast address for a given service hard coded? And that all
operators providing this service will use the same anycast address for
the service? That seems a big ask but unless you do that, DNS is still
required. And that is putting aside the fact that we have found that
the indirection through DNS and the resultant decoupling is very helpful.
Yours,
Joel
_______________________________________________
rtgwg mailing list
rtgwg@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
