Hi Bob,
Thank you very much for your valuable comments.
My answers are inline below with [HC].
Best Regards,
Huaimo
-----Original Message-----
From: Bob Halley via Datatracker <nore...@ietf.org>
Sent: Wednesday, July 26, 2023 7:52 AM
To: int-...@ietf.org
Cc: draft-ietf-rtgwg-srv6-egress-protection....@ietf.org; rtgwg@ietf.org
Subject: Intdir early review of draft-ietf-rtgwg-srv6-egress-protection-10
Reviewer: Bob Halley
Review result: Ready
I am an assigned INT directorate reviewer for
draft-ietf-rtgwg-srv6-egress-protection-09. These comments were written
primarily for the benefit of the Internet Area Directors. Document editors and
shepherd(s) should treat these comments just like they would treat comments
from any other IETF contributors and resolve them along with any other Last
Call comments that have been received. For more details on the INT Directorate,
see https://datatracker.ietf.org/group/intdir/about/
<https://datatracker.ietf.org/group/intdir/about/>.
Based on my review, the document IS ready to go to IETF Last Call and therefore
CAN be forwarded to the IESG.
I reviewed version 9 of the document, and saw that version 10 was out right
before submitting this review, so I reviewed it as well. My comments below
apply to both versions, but the line numbers are from draft 9.
Example 3.2 mentions the importance of P1 retaining the route to PE3 for a time
as it is PLR. Given the importance of this behavior, should it be mentioned in
the normative text of section 3.1? (I'm not sure if this is specified in
another document, but if not, mentioning it in the normative section would be
good.)
[HC]: Added text to mention it in normative section 3.1.
The following are minor issues (typos, misspelling, minor text improvements)
with the document:
"will be one of the followings" should be "will be one of the following" on
lines 288, 306, and 436.
[HC]: Changed them as you suggested.
On line 382, "retent" should be "retained".
[HC]: Changed it accordingly.
_______________________________________________
rtgwg mailing list
rtgwg@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
