Aseem, Thank you very much for the review and the comments. Resolutions to your comments are inserted below. They will be reflected in version-28.
Linda From: Aseem Choudhary <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2023 7:08 PM To: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Subject: draft-ietf-rtgwg-net2cloud-problem-statement-27 Hello Authors, Thanks for the writing the document! After going through it, I have some questions/comments: 1. Section 5: Heading looks something miss to me since main heading mentions "method to scale .." while sub-sections mention "issues.. ", "poor performance ..". Maybe it can be adjusted or if it is mainly issues/mitigation, it can be combined with Section 3? [Linda] Thanks for pointing it out. How about changing the subtitles to: 5.1: Improving IPsec Tunnels Management 5.2: 5.2. Improving performance Over Public Internet 1. Section 6: Can it be enhanced to add: 1. Scalability of transit/spoke gateways itself as workloads are increased/migrated. 2. Traffic engineering to distribute loads across regions/AZs based on performance/availability of workloads etc. as well as for connecting to other CSPs. 3. Network Traffic traceability, logging and diagnostics. [Linda] Thank you very much for the suggestion. Best, Aseem
_______________________________________________ rtgwg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
