Thanks Donald! Acee, the review was requested as a normal directorate review after AD review - the RTG ADs try to make sure that each document gets various directorate reviews during the IETF last-call and before placing the document on the telechat for balloting.
Jim -----Original Message----- From: Donald Eastlake <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, December 15, 2023 12:09 AM To: Acee Lindem <[email protected]> Cc: Routing ADs <[email protected]>; Routing Directorate <[email protected]>; [email protected]; RTGWG <[email protected]>; Last Call <[email protected]> Subject: Re: RTGDIR Last Call Review of draft-ietf-rtgwg-vrrp-rfc5798bis-13.txt Hi Acee, On Wed, Dec 13, 2023 at 8:00 AM Acee Lindem <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Donald, > > On Dec 13, 2023, at 00:50, Donald Eastlake <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Acee, > > On Tue, Dec 12, 2023 at 8:53 PM Acee Lindem <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Donald, > > See some discussion inline regarding the IANA Considerations, RFC > 7042, and RFC 7042BIS. > > ... > > Actually, your review sort of came out of nowhere as this RFC 5798 BIS > has already had both an early (although it was quite late) and IETF > last call review. It is on the IEGG telecast on 1-4-2024. It you > looked at the datatracker you would have seen this 😎 My apologies for the tardiness of my review. It came out of a request by Jim Guichard and I did look at the datatracker. I have looked at the -14 version that has been posted and I consider my comments to have been resolved. Thanks, Donald =============================== Donald E. Eastlake 3rd +1-508-333-2270 (cell) 2386 Panoramic Circle, Apopka, FL 32703 USA [email protected] _______________________________________________ rtgwg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
