Hi Eric, > On Jan 4, 2024, at 09:53, Éric Vyncke via Datatracker <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Éric Vyncke has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-rtgwg-vrrp-rfc5798bis-17: No Objection > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all > email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this > introductory paragraph, however.) > > > Please refer to > https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ > for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. > > > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rtgwg-vrrp-rfc5798bis/ > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > COMMENT: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > I am afraid that I cannot offer a detailed review of this document, i.e., I > will rely on Dave Thaler's intdir review at > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/review-ietf-rtgwg-vrrp-rfc5798bis-15-intdir-telechat-thaler-2023-12-27/ > (and I have seen that Acee and Dave have discussed the topics). > > After reading Erik Kline's ballot review, I second his points.
I’ve addressed Dave’s comments in the -16 version and Eric’s in the -17 version. I’ll submit an -18 version today with the nits raised by John and Murray. You should vote “Yes” 😎 Thanks, Acee > > > _______________________________________________ rtgwg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
