Hi, Nan, 

Thanks for the comments. 

Yes, we only consider IPv6 in our draft, because, 1) we only implement and 
deploy the IPv6 version currently. 2) Things will be much simpler in IPv6 
scenario than IPv4. 

Best Regards, 

Shu 


> -----原始邮件-----
> 发件人: gengnan <[email protected]>
> 发送时间:2024-03-03 18:31:55 (星期日)
> 收件人: 杨术 <[email protected]>
> 抄送: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
> 主题: RE: New Version Notification for 
> draft-llsyang-rtgwg-dst-src-routing-02.txt
> 
> Hi Shu,
> 
> I had a quick look at the updated draft. A "source address table" in 
> data-plane can be useful in some cases. 
> 
> My basic question is why IPv4 is not in scope of this document, though the 
> Introduction section briefly mentions that it is due to the consideration of 
> implementation complexity. Is the dst-src-routing not recommended for IPv4?
> 
> Best,
> Nan
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: rtgwg <[email protected]> On Behalf Of 杨术
> Sent: Friday, March 1, 2024 1:32 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Fw: New Version Notification for 
> draft-llsyang-rtgwg-dst-src-routing-02.txt
> 
> Hi RTGWG,
>  
> We have updated the src/dst routing draft, your comments are welcomed!
> 
> Best,
> 
> Shu 
> 
> 
> > -----原始邮件-----
> > 发件人: [email protected]
> > 发送时间:2024-01-31 23:49:47 (星期三)
> > 收件人: "Anton Smirnov" <[email protected]>, "David Lamparter" 
> > <[email protected]>, "Jen Linkova" <[email protected]>, 
> > "Mingwei Xu" <[email protected]>, "Shu Yang" <[email protected]>
> > 主题: New Version Notification for 
> > draft-llsyang-rtgwg-dst-src-routing-02.txt
> > 
> > A new version of Internet-Draft 
> > draft-llsyang-rtgwg-dst-src-routing-02.txt has been successfully 
> > submitted by Shu Yang and posted to the IETF repository.
> > 
> > Name:     draft-llsyang-rtgwg-dst-src-routing
> > Revision: 02
> > Title:    Destination/Source Routing
> > Date:     2024-01-31
> > Group:    Individual Submission
> > Pages:    23
> > URL:      
> > https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-llsyang-rtgwg-dst-src-routing-02.txt
> > Status:   
> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-llsyang-rtgwg-dst-src-routing/
> > HTMLized: 
> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-llsyang-rtgwg-dst-src-routing
> > Diff:     
> > https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-llsyang-rtgwg-dst-src-routing-02
> > 
> > Abstract:
> > 
> >    This note specifies using packets' source addresses in route lookups
> >    as additional qualifier to be used in hop-by-hop routing decisions.
> >    This applies to IPv6 [RFC2460] in general with specific
> >    considerations for routing protocol left for separate documents.
> >    There is nothing precluding similar operation in IPv4, but this is
> >    not in scope of this document.
> > 
> >    Note that destination/source routing, source/destination routing,
> >    SADR, source-specific routing, source-sensitive routing, S/D routing
> >    and D/S routing are all used synonymously.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > The IETF Secretariat
> > 
> _______________________________________________
> rtgwg mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
> _______________________________________________
> rtgwg mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
_______________________________________________
rtgwg mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg

Reply via email to