Hi Alvaro, My understanding from RF8789 is that it requires WG last call but not rough consensus. I am also not clear on how you measure rough consensus?
I think the *sat-int* email list has satellites experts who can provide their feedback. If this not the case, and if RTGWG does not have satellites experts, then how we can make well-informed decision about this draft without asking for help from external reviewers who can join the RTGWG if needed. Thanks Hesham On Tue, Apr 2, 2024, 1:21 PM Alvaro Retana <[email protected]> wrote: > On April 2, 2024 at 3:10:09 PM, Hesham ElBakoury wrote: > > Hesham: > > Hi! > > > Can we get external reviewers to look at this draft? > > That's a question for the chairs. > > Given that all IETF stream documents require consensus (rfc8789), I > don't know how an external review figures into that. > > > Alvaro. > > > > On Tue, Apr 2, 2024, 7:49 AM Alvaro Retana wrote: > > > Hi! > > > > > > I have the same concerns as Stewart. > > > > > > We don’t have the experience or expertise to review the document, > > > including the assumptions. This topic is interesting, but without the > > > ability to review it properly, I don’t think this draft (or any other > > > related work) should be adopted. > > > > > > Alvaro. >
_______________________________________________ rtgwg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
