Hi WG,

I support the adoption of this draft. It is a quite useful draft, which clearly 
introduces the limitations and problems of existing mechanisms for rapid 
notification of critical network events.

Best regards
Li

> -----邮件原件-----
> 发件人: Yingzhen Qu via Datatracker <[email protected]>
> 发送时间: 2026年1月16日 3:12
> 收件人: [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected]
> 主题: [rtgwg] Call for adoption: draft-dong-fantel-problem-statement-03 (Ends
> 2026-01-30)
> 
> This message starts a rtgwg WG Call for Adoption of:
> draft-dong-fantel-problem-statement-03
> 
> This Working Group Call for Adoption ends on 2026-01-30
> 
> Abstract:
>    Modern networks require adaptive traffic manipulation including
>    Traffic Engineering (TE), load balancing, flow control, and
>    protection, to support high-throughput, low-latency, and lossless
>    applications such as Artificial Intelligence (AI) /Machine Learning
>    (ML) training and real-time services.  A good and timely
>    understanding of network operational status, such as congestion and
>    failures, can help to improve network utilization, enable the
>    selection of paths with reduced latency, and enable faster response
>    to critical events.  This document describes the existing problems
>    and why a new set of fast network notification solutions are needed.
> 
> Please reply to this message and indicate whether or not you support adoption
> of this Internet-Draft by the rtgwg WG. Comments to explain your preference
> are greatly appreciated. Please reply to all recipients of this message and
> include this message in your response.
> 
> Authors, and WG participants in general, are reminded of the Intellectual
> Property Rights (IPR) disclosure obligations described in BCP 79 [2].
> Appropriate IPR disclosures required for full conformance with the provisions 
> of
> BCP 78 [1] and BCP 79 [2] must be filed, if you are aware of any.
> Sanctions available for application to violators of IETF IPR Policy can be 
> found at
> [3].
> 
> Thank you.
> [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/bcp78/
> [2] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/bcp79/
> [3] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6701/
> 
> The IETF datatracker status page for this Internet-Draft is:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dong-fantel-problem-statement/
> 
> There is also an HTMLized version available at:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-dong-fantel-problem-statement-03
> 
> A diff from the previous version is available at:
> https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-dong-fantel-problem-statement-0
> 3
> 
> _______________________________________________
> rtgwg mailing list -- [email protected]
> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
_______________________________________________
rtgwg mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to