Hi Manoj,

Thanks for bringing out these decisions. Just as I thought, for the
CIC / RTI proceedings, "review" cannot be availed as matter of right.
 It is better to ask for "Full Bench" consideration of the appeal in
place of review.

There must be some unique situation (as defined in CPC) for review,
like a) error evident on the face of the record b) Some new evidence
not available (for genuine reasons) at the time having a crucial
bearing on the issue, etc. In any case my advocates always tell me not
to go for review - in most cases the authority is reluctant to change
his decision (admission of wrong doing) and will go out of his way to
prop up his old decision even further. Going for review also limits
your further appeal pleadings (as per some other provisions of CPC).

IMO, for 2nd Appeal the CIC has no powers of Court (only for Complaint
u/s 18) and cannot direct all these affidavits to be filed for Appeal
proceedings - so always file Complaint along with 2nd Appeal.

Sarbajit

--- In [email protected], "Manoj Pai" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Please check some of these decisions, before finalizing your own
> decisions.
> 
> cic.gov.in/CIC-Orders/Decision_16052006_01.pdf 
> cic.gov.in/CIC-Orders/CIC_Order_Dtd_03042006_4.pdf
> cic.gov.in/CIC-Orders/Decision_23052006.pdf 
> cic.gov.in/CIC-Orders/Decision_20112006_5.pdf
> cic.gov.in/CIC-Orders/Decision_18082006_2.pdf
> 
> Manoj
> 
> --- In [email protected], "prem.lata" <bimal.khemani@> wrote:
> >
> > Dear Sarbajit
> > I will request my fellow  member and will send you the details of the 
> > file of BSNL, where CIC Mr. M.A. ANSARI has directed the PIO for 
> > filling the affidavit.
> > As per the provisions of Code of Civil Procedures order 47, stricture 
> > 114, one can file a review petition in the same coyrt andc the same 
> > court/commission may review the hearing and pass another order.
> > BIMAL
> > 
> > P.S. I would be cautious in writting my comments and desist from
using 
> > such language.
> >
>


Reply via email to