Madam / Sir:

PMC TAX DEPARTMENT ACTS AS BLIND AS A BAT TO CITIZENS APPLICATIONS

Pune Municipal Corporation is boasting about its record tax 
collection. But are you paying the property tax at higher rate? Is 
your tax invoice correct? Is your conveyance deed application 
pending with PMC since years? Check out this Right to Information 
(RTI) success story where a senior citizen battled with E-governance 
savvy Pune Municipal Corporation (PMC) who acted as blind as a bat 
to his applications pending since 2003. Records are managed in a 
pitiable condition exposed this RTI application.

Sudhakar Dandawate, a senior citizen, is resident of Tulip 
Apartments, Mrutyunjay society, Kothrud Pune. He retired from 
military services. Tulip apartments is five flat abode to seniors 
like him. They jointly filed society deed of declaration and 
requested flat wise bills to PMC authorities on May 12, 2003. It 
derived no response but still we pay our corporation taxes 
regularly, said these senior citizens. 

Frustrated with this attitude of tax department of PMC, on December 
31, 2007, Dandawate filed an application under RTI Act 2005. This 
application was returned by postal authorities with a comment not 
taken or address not found. This returned application was re-sent to 
Pune Municipal Commissionerate praying information about action 
taken on their application dated May 12, 2003. This time it was 
accepted and was confirmed as delivered by speed post agency. 

RTI act 2005 stipulates public information officer to provide 
information in 30 calendar days but PMC maintained the silence and 
showed their thick skin, experienced this ex-serviceman. This 
silence was broken when PMC authorities received an appeal under 
section 19(1) of RTI act 2005. Tax department directed field 
officers to run for cover. They obtained extra copy of deed of 
declaration from applicant as they couldn't find originally 
submitted documents in PMC record. 

Appeal Number 14/2008 was fixed on March 26, 2008 at PMC head 
quarters. After hearing both the parties and perusal of papers 
appellate authority found that public information officer (PIO) 
failed to furnish written reply to RTI application. The request 
originally submitted in 2003 was required to be attended by 
employees responsible at that time and show-cause notice (SCN) 
should be issued to them for delaying citizen's work, was further 
ordered in order dated March 26, 2008. After obtaining extra set of 
records from applicant, PMC tax officials pleaded that deed of 
declaration and flat wise bills are ready now and appellate 
authority passed an order to share the information within 15 days of 
this order.

This particular issue is almost resolved with the use of RTI Act 
2005 but exposed serious lapse in the record management of Pune 
Municipal Corporation. Many state information commissioners under 
RTI act 2005 have taken serious view of documents not traceable, 
files lost and such submissions by PIO's and hence this case was one 
more out of the blue jolt to E-governance savvy PMC.
(Avinash represented appellant in appeal)

Reply via email to