Dear Friends
Please find enclosed as in line text at the end of this mail, an order
passed by Kerala Information Commission declaring that the office of the
Minister of the Finance Minister is not a Public Office for the purpose of
applicability of RTI Act. Chief Information Commissioner Mr Mr Palat
Mohandas passed this order on 31.03.2008 declaring that the office of the
Minister is not a a Public Authority.

The Commission observed that for the applicability of the RTI Act, it is
necessary for the office to come under section 2 (h) and also possess some
information as defined under section 2 (j). The Commission observed that the
as the office of the Minister does not "generate" any information and as
there is no permanent staff attached to this office, the office of the
Minister is not a Public Authority as defined under the RTI Act.

The Commission also differentiated the office of the Minister with the Prime
Minister's Office and held that the PMO acts as an independent secretariat
covering a wide range of issues while the office of the Minister takes into
account matters only concerning that ministry. The Commission, thus observed
that the office of the Minister is not a Public Authority.

This is a very bad order and we plan to challenge this order in Kerala High
Court. Please send your comments and opinion on this order. Please also send
us the copies of orders passed by different Information Commissions either
on similar lines or declaring the office of the minister as Public Authority
under the RTI Act.

The copy of the order is attached as in line text at the end of this mail. I
have a scanned pdf copy of this order. In case any member needs the same,
please send me an email. I will send it immediately. Group mails does not
support sending annexures.

Thanks and Regards!

*Divya Jyoti Jaipuriar*
Advocate
Public Cause Research Foundation
(A Parivartan Initiative)
Delhi 110095
Tel/ Fax: +91 11 22356759
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________


STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION, KERALA

PUNNEN ROAD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 039

Tel: 0471 2335199, Fax: 0471 2330920

Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Proceedings of the State Information Commission, Kerala in Complaint
petition

CP No. 882/2007/SIC

(No.6558/SIC-Gen3/2007)



Present



Sri. Palat Mohandas

Chief Information Commissioner



Sri. Mundela P. Basheer,

Chairman, Pothujanavedi,

Punnakkadayil, Kaniyapuram

Thiruvananthapuram 695 301
Appellant



1. Public Information Officer

Finance Department,

Secretariat,

Thiruvananthapuram
Respondent





ORDER



The complaint filed by ShrLMundela P.Basheer under the RTI Act 2005 was
received by the Commission on *3/1/2008 *and was admitted as C.P *
No.882/07/SIC.*



The complainant had filed an application fer information before the Office
of the Minister for Finance on 08.03.07 for getting an enquiry report of
Finance Inspection wing regarding certain-allegations. The Public
Information Officer, Finance Department had given him a reply on 5.5.07,
24.7.07, 13.8.07. Aggrieved by the decision of the Public Information
Officer he filed the Complaint before the ' State Information Commission on
17.9.07.



On getting the complaint, the Information Commission asked for a detailed
report. It was submitted on *16/02/08. *The Information Commission carefully
examined the complaint and the report. The commission had also, considered
the , request of Shri Mundela P.Basheer to nominate the Public Information
Officer and Appellate Authority in the Office of the Minister (Finance)
considering the position that the Office of the Minister is a Public
Authority.



The Commission observed that in order to become a Public Authority, an
authority should come under the definition of Section (2)(h) and it should
possess information as defined under Section 2(f) read with Section 2(j).
Over and above it should be upkeeping some information . As a matter of
fact, Office of the Minister does not -qenerate any information. There is no
permanent staff in the Office of the Minister. The staff is drawn from
Government Departments/ Public Sector Undertakings on deputation basis or on
direct appointment purely on temporary (Co-terminus) basis in accordance
with the personal discretion of the Minister. .They are accountable to the
Minister only. The personal staff is to assist the Minister personally in
the discharge of his duties.



The Government Secretariat support the Minister, in the discharge of his
official duties. The Minister heads the Secretariat department. The
Secretariat civil service is a permanent establishment and they
create/possess/access information and maintain records of the Government.
The Minister is expected to take final decision, on the file processed by
the concerned Secretariat based on the Govt. policy of the time and also
observing the rules and regulations in force. The Secretariat is accountable
to the respective Minister. And, any view expressed by and information
provided by a Minister should be in tune with the Government policy/s and as
per records / information held by the Secretariat.



The staff of the Minister are not an independent entity and its
establishments is controlled and maintained by the General Administration
Department. In usual course all applications put to the Minister under RTI
act are to be responded to by the authorities empowered by the RTI Act in
the respective Secretariat Department.

So far as the case of Prime Minister's Office is concerned , it is
functioning as an independent Secretariat, for assisting the Prime-Minister
for the discharge of his duties.

Historically, it was also like any other personal staff of a Minister but it
was enlarged and specific functions given by appropriating them from the
Ministries by successive Prime Ministers. A debate on its role and function
is still on. All other Ministers are given charge of respective Ministries
and their role is confined to that particular Ministry



In view of the above, the Commission does not consider that Office of the
Minister is a.Public Authority and it should have separate Assistant Public
Information Officer, Public Information Officer or Appellate Authority.

For the factors cited above, the complaint is found to be devoid of merits
and is disposed off accordingly.



Dated this the 31 st day of March 2008.





*Sd/-*

* *

*Palat Mohandas*

Chief Information Commissioner

SECRETARY



______________________________________________________________________________________________________



-- 
DivyaJyoti Jaipuriar, Advocate
Public Cause Research Foundation
(A Parivartan Initiative)
www.parivartan.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tel/ Fax: +91 11 22356759
Cell: +91 9868002365
Visit me at www.jaipuriar.com/index.htm
National RTI Helpline No. +91 9718100180

=====-----=====-----=====-----=====-----=====
Notice: The information contained in this e-mail message and/or
attachment(s) to it may contain confidential or privileged information. If
you are not the intended recipient, any dissemination, use, review,
distribution, printing or copying of the information contained in this
e-mail message and/or attachment(s) to it are strictly prohibited. If you
have received this communication in error, please notify us by reply e-mail
or telephone and immediately and permanently delete the message and any
attachment(s). Before opening any mail and attachment(s) please check them
for viruses and defect. Thank you
=====-----=====-----=====-----=====-----=====


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Reply via email to