At 09:16 AM 4/21/2008, Sidharth wrote:

>Judges unwilling to Share Wealth Details
>----------------------------------------------------------
>by Nagendar Sharma in Hindustan Times ePaper April 20, 2008
>
><http://tinyurl.com/4elnx2>http://tinyurl.com/4elnx2
>
>THE JUDGES of the Supreme Court and High Courts are not willing to
>divulge details of their wealth and disciplinary action taken against
>them on corruption and misconduct charges.

True and timely information must correspond to the surrounding 
circumstances or it is not a healthy growth.  If a survey is 
conducted by non-partial agency, there will be many judges across the 
country who pass judgements under the influence of corrupt 
politicians like reservations and their own children study abroad 
away from hassles/problems of admission in Indian Universities. Can a 
honest judge really afford costly education for his children abroad ? 
Had judiciary/courts be transparent like parliament proceedings, it 
would have been a healthy trend towards healthy democracy. We all 
know how our parliamentarians behaves in public but what do we know 
about behaviour of judges towards common citizens in secured court 
rooms without cameras ?

Definitely corrupt judges have unaccountable wealth, which may put 
our former President Kalam or present Prime Minister Manmohan Singh nowhere.

The response is like Holy Saint with Power, Fame and Luxurious 
comforts preaching simplicity to its followers.

In a democratic setup, free flow of information invested in the 
promotion of RTI gives a tenfold return to the people even as a seed 
sown in good soil returns a luxuriant crop. Perhaps our judiciary 
could highlight the Gandhian Philosophy.

http://www.mkgandhi.org/edugandhi/index.htm

Everyone of us has good inherent in the soul it needs to be drawn out 
by the teachers, and only those teachers can perform this sacred 
function whose own character is unsullied, who are always ready to 
learn and to grow from perfection to perfection.

In same analogy, only those judges can perform sacred function of 
granting true justice whose own characters are unsullied, who are 
always ready to learn and to grow perfection to perfection.  One 
former judge had said if there are no protest against corruption, a 
living person in support of corrupt activities is no less than moving 
dead body.


>Justice Khare said the judiciary could not escape accountability
>measures, which it wanted others to follow "Everybody holding a
>constitutional office in this country is accountable, and so are the
>judges.

If there is no free flow of information, the day similar to Maoist of 
Nepal (Maoists give Nepal king 4 weeks to leave palace) is not far, 
when Indian citizens may shout something like this  -

MY LORD, THERE'S A CASE AGAINST YOU And the Judgement will be 
delivered by citizens.

http://www.tehelka.com/story_main24.asp?filename=Ne123006My_lords.asp










[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Reply via email to