UP axes CIC after CBI claim of evidence to try Mayawati

by Kajari Bhattacharya, The Statesman,  http://tinyurl.com/5p33qk

NEW DELHI/LUCKNOW, July 10: Hours after the CBI today told the Supreme
Court that it had "sufficient" evidence to prosecute Uttar Pradesh
chief minister Miss Mayawati in a disproportionate assets case
registered against her five years ago, balls of retaliatory action
started rolling in Lucknow. In the first action of its kind taken
against a state's chief information commissioner (CIC) anywhere in the
country, UP Governor TV Rajeswar put UP CIC Justice (Retd) Mr MA Khan
under suspension and prohibited him from attending office for alleged
corruption, misconduct and irregularities in appointing employees.
Justice (Retd) Mr Khan was a Mulayam Singh Yadav appointee.

The CBI filed an affidavit in the SC saying it will shortly file a
chargesheet in a disproportionate assets case registered against the
BSP supremo in 2003. It said there was ample evidence to show that
Miss Mayawati had amassed wealth disproportionate to her known sources
of income while responding to a notice issued to it on a petition
filed by her. The UP CM was seeking quashing of criminal proceedings
against her in the case which she alleged was politically motivated.
In Lucknow, a highly-placed source said: "We have sent a reference to
the SC, which will form a committee to inquire into the allegations
and then decide if Justice (Retd) MA Khan will be removed from
office." The source added: "The allegations have been confined to
misconduct and irregularities in hiring employees. We do not want to
level allegations of misappropriation of funds, as these undermine a
Constitutional authority, which a CIC is." He said that in spite of
the fact that the CIC was not supposed to make appointments directly,
Justice (Retd) allegedly Mr Khan had done so, flouting recruitment
rules. "There were no advertisements, no tests." Other information
commissioners were also critical of the CIC.

Magsaysay awardee and RTI activist Mr Sandeep Pandey said many
complaints against the CIC had been forwarded to the Governor. "The
CIC was more partial to public information officers, who are
government employees, and harsh with RTI applicants. Hearings are
pending in thousands," Mr Pandey alleged.
Justice (Retd) Mr Khan's tenure was due to end in November. The CIC
was appointed in 2005, during the last days of the Mulayam Singh Yadav
government in UP. The appointment was seen by many as a reward from Mr
Yadav to Justice (Retd) Mr Khan, who, as an HC judge in 2003, had
issued a highly-controversial ruling in an anti-defection case that
helped the SP come to power the same year in the state.



http://www.thestatesman.net/page.news.php?clid=1&theme=&usrsess=1&id=212915

Reply via email to